Asphalt Mix Design & Quality Control Platform
THEME
LOOK & FEEL
TEXT SIZE 100%
STEP 1 / 12
AGGREGATE GRADATION (BY TYPE)

TEST REPORTSieve Analysis of Raw Aggregate Stockpiles — by Material Type (ASTM C136 / AASHTO T27)

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE
SOURCE / QUARRYTESTED BY

1. SIEVE LIST (SHARED ACROSS ALL MATERIALS)

Add or remove a sieve here — the change applies automatically to every material table below, keeping them aligned for later blending.

2. GRADATION PER MATERIAL

Enter the CUMULATIVE weight retained on each sieve (the total weight retained on this sieve and all coarser sieves above it) — not the individual weight retained on that sieve alone.

MIX DESIGN REPORTMarshall Method Asphalt Mix Design — Combined Aggregate Gradation & Optimum Bitumen Content (ASTM D6926 / D6927 — Asphalt Institute MS-2)

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE
CLIENTREF. NO.
LOCATIONDESIGNED BY
MIX TYPE / COURSEBINDER GRADE
NMAS (Nominal Max. Aggregate Size)
SPEC. REFERENCE
Note: Default spec limits below are typical placeholders and are fully editable — please confirm/adjust them against your selected reference standard before final approval.

1. COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADATION (JOB MIX FORMULA)

SIEVE SPEC LOW SPEC HIGH COMBINED
%PASS		 PASS
(x=no)		 ACTION
BLEND RATIO % —
Sum of Blend Ratios: 0.0%

2. TRIAL SPECIMENS AT VARYING ASPHALT CONTENT

Add one card for every asphalt content (AC%). Inside each card, enter the RAW Gmm data (Wmm, W1, W2) and the RAW Gmb data (Dry, SSD, Water weight) for every mold/specimen — the averages, Air Voids, VMA, VFA and Unit Weight are calculated automatically for that AC%.

MARSHALL DESIGN CURVES (vs. Asphalt Content)

The dashed red vertical line marks the Final Design Optimum Bitumen Content (OBC) on every curve.

3. DESIGN BASIS

Target Air Voids, Va (for OBC curve method)%

4. OPTIMUM BITUMEN CONTENT (OBC) DETERMINATION

Per the Asphalt Institute MS-2 method, the design OBC is the average of the AC% at maximum stability, AC% at maximum unit weight (density), and AC% at the target air voids — all read directly from the curves above.
Method AC % (Pb)
AC % at Maximum Stability-
AC % at Maximum Unit Weight (Density)-
AC % at Target Air Voids-
FINAL DESIGN — OPTIMUM BITUMEN CONTENT (OBC)
-
Average of the three methods above, read from the design curves

5. FINAL DESIGN SUMMARY (AT OBC) — COMPLIANCE TABLE

Saves/loads all limits below plus the Core % Compaction min/max, so one preset covers a full spec (e.g. a specific standard or agency).
All limits in the Requirement column are fully editable — type your own project spec limits directly into the boxes and the Status column updates instantly.
Property Value @ OBC Requirement (editable) Status
Stability (Kg) - ≥ -
Flow (mm) - – -
VMA (%) - ≥ -
VFA (%) - – -
Air Voids, Va (%) - – -
Dust / Effective Binder Ratio - – -
Moisture Susceptibility — Retained Stability Loss (%) - ≤ -
Unit Weight (kg/m³) - — —
Note: VMA min. is auto-suggested when you change the NMAS selection in section 2, and Retained Stability Loss is read live from the Marshall Stability tab (ideally re-run that test at the final OBC to confirm).
-

6. NOTES

Designed By
Reviewed By
Approved By

TEST REPORTQuantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures & Mechanical Size Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (ASTM D2172/D2172M & ASTM D5444)

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE SAMPLED
CLIENTREFERENCE
LOCATIONTESTED BY
MATERIALSAMPLE NO.
DATE TESTEDREPORT NO.
SPECIFICATION

EXTRACTION TEST

A . WEIGHT OF SAMPLE BEFORE WASHINGgm
B . WEIGHT OF SAMPLE AFTER WASHINGgm
C . INITIAL WEIGHT OF FILTERgm
D . WEIGHT OF FILTER AFTER TESTgm
E . WEIGHT ATTACHED TO FILTER   (D-C)gm
F . TOTAL WEIGHT OF AGGREGATES   (B+E)gm
G . WEIGHT OF BITUMEN   (A-F)gm
H . AGGREGATE CONTENT   (F/A x 100)%
I . BITUMEN CONTENT   (G/A x 100)%

GRADATION TEST

SIEVE No. WEIGHT
RETAINED		 CUM.
RETAINED		 PERCENT
RETAINED		 PERCENT
PASSING		 SPEC LOW SPEC HIGH JMF
TOL.		 PASS
(x=no)		 ACTION

3. TEST CONDITIONS & METHOD

Test Method:
Sample Preparation:
Ignition Oven Temp.:
Extraction Solvent:
Washing:
Drying Temperature:
Balance Accuracy:
Technician:

4. NOTES

Tested By
Reviewed By
Approved By

MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF PAVING MIXTURE ( ASTM D2041, AASHTO T-209 )

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE SAMPLED
CLIENTREFERENCE
LOCATIONTESTED BY
MATERIALSAMPLE NO.
REPORT NO.MIX TYPE
RECEIVED DATETEST DATE

EQUIPMENT INFORMATION

VACUUM CONTAINERFLASK CAPACITY
BALANCE IDBALANCE ACCURACY
WATER TEMPERATURECALIBRATION STATUS
VACUUM GAUGE IDTHERMOMETER ID
WATER BATH ID

INPUT DATA

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ( AGGREGATE ), Gsb-
SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF ASPHALT, Gb-
BITUMEN CONTENT, PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF MIX, Pb%

TEST SAMPLES (Gmm)

TEST No. NET WEIGHT OF
LOOSE MIX (Wmm), gm		 NET WEIGHT OF
FLASK & WATER (W1), gm		 NET WEIGHT OF FLASK,
SAMPLE & WATER (W2), gm		 Gmm
AVERAGE MAXIMUM THEORETICAL SP. GR., Gmm(avg) -

CALCULATIONS ( USING AVERAGE Gmm )

AVG. MAX. THEORETICAL SP. GR., Gmm = Average of all valid samples above
EFFECTIVE SPE. GR., Gse =
100 - Pb
100 / Gmm - Pb / Gb
ASPHALT ABSORPTION, Pba =
( Gse - Gsb )
( Gse ) ( Gsb )
x Gb x 100
EFFECTIVE ASPHALT CONT., Pbe = Pb -
Pba
100
x Gsb

TEST CONDITIONS

Standard:
Water Temperature:
Vacuum Pressure:
Test Method:
Drying Temperature (if used):
Vacuum Duration:
Maximum Vacuum Level:

REMARKS

Tested By
Reviewed By
Approved By

TEST REPORTMarshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures & Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Non-Absorptive Compacted Bituminous Mixtures & Percent Air Voids in Compacted Asphalt Mixtures (ASTM D2726 - ASTM D6927 - ASTM D3203)

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE SAMPLED
CLIENTREF. NO.
LOCATIONTESTED BY
MATERIALSAMPLE NO.
NMAS (Nominal Max. Aggregate Size)
TYPE OF SPECIMEN (§3.1 / §8.1.1) BINDER GRADE
TEST METHOD (§4.1.1) TEST TEMPERATURE (§8.1.7) °C

BULK DENSITY

30 MINS SOAKED 24 HOURS SOAKED
SpecimenNo. 123456
Wt. In Air DryGm.
Wt. In Air SSDGm.
Wt. In WaterGm.
Height of Specimen (D3549)mm
Volume of Specimen (SSD-Water)- --- ---
Sp. Grav. of Specimen (Dry/Vol)- --- ---
Av. Sp. Grav. of Specimen (Gmb)- - -

AIR VOIDS

Sym. Description Unit Formula 30 Mins Soaked 24 Hours Soaked
PbBitumen % by Wt. Of Mix% -
GmmMax Measured Sp. Gravity- -
GseEff. Aggregate Sp. Gravity-
( 100 - Pb )
{ (100 / Gmm) - (Pb / Gb) }
PbaBitumen Loss % by Abs.%
( Gse - Gsb )
( Gse x Gsb )
x Gb x 100 		--
PbeEff. Bitumen Content% Pb -
( 100 - Pb )
100
x Pba 		--
EACBitumen % by Volume%
( Gmb x Pbe )
Gb
 --
VpaAir Voids in Total Mix%
Gmm - Gmb
Gmm
x 100 		--
VMAVoids in Mineral Aggregate% 100 -
{ (100 - Pb) Gmb }
Gsb
 --
VFVoids Filled%
EAC X 100
VMA
 --

STABILITY

RING CALIBRATION FACTOR (Proving Ring Constant)
Enter the factor exactly as shown on your ring's current calibration certificate, then pick the unit it's stated in — the app converts it to Kg/Div automatically.
123456
Dial ReadingNo.
Stability  (Dial Reading x Ring Factor)Kg --- ---
Volume Correction Factor↺ auto
Corrected StabilityKg. --- ---
Average Corrected Stab.Kg. - -
TABLE 1 — Stability Correction Factors (ASTM D6927-15, Table 1) — Applied automatically above from measured specimen volume; editable if needed
Volume of Specimen (cm³) Thickness (in.) Thickness (mm) Correlation Ratio
200 to 2131.00 (1)25.45.56
214 to 2251.06 (1 1/16)27.05.00
226 to 2371.12 (1 1/8)28.64.55
238 to 2501.19 (1 3/16)30.24.17
251 to 2641.25 (1 1/4)31.83.85
265 to 2761.31 (1 5/16)33.33.57
277 to 2891.38 (1 3/8)34.93.33
290 to 3011.44 (1 7/16)36.53.03
302 to 3161.50 (1 1/2)38.12.78
317 to 3281.56 (1 9/16)39.72.50
329 to 3401.62 (1 5/8)41.32.27
341 to 3531.69 (1 11/16)42.92.08
354 to 3671.75 (1 3/4)44.41.92
368 to 3791.81 (1 13/16)46.01.79
380 to 3921.88 (1 7/8)47.61.67
393 to 4051.94 (1 15/16)49.21.56
406 to 4202.00 (2)50.81.47
421 to 4312.06 (2 1/16)52.41.39
432 to 4432.12 (2 1/8)54.01.32
444 to 4562.19 (2 3/16)55.61.25
457 to 4702.25 (2 1/4)57.21.19
471 to 4822.31 (2 5/16)58.71.14
483 to 4952.38 (2 3/8)60.31.09
496 to 5082.44 (2 7/16)61.91.04
509 to 5222.50 (2 1/2)63.51.00
523 to 5352.56 (2 9/16)65.10.96
536 to 5462.62 (2 5/8)66.70.93
547 to 5592.69 (2 11/16)68.30.89
560 to 5732.75 (2 3/4)69.80.86
574 to 5852.81 (2 13/16)71.40.83
586 to 5982.88 (2 7/8)73.00.81
599 to 6102.94 (2 15/16)74.60.78
611 to 6263.00 (3)76.20.76
Note: Laboratory molded specimens shall satisfy the thickness tolerance of 2.50 ± 0.10 in. (63.5 ± 2.5 mm) — highlighted range above — per ASTM D6927 §7.1. Field-core results with larger corrections should be used with caution and shall not be used for specification/acceptance comparisons across labs (§4.1.7).

FLOW

123456
Dial Reading(.01")
Flow Individualmm --- ---
Average Flowmm - -
PERCENTAGE LOSS OF STABILITY
-
Acceptable limit: max 25% loss (typical spec)
Tested By
Reviewed By
Approved By

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY & PERCENT COMPACTION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT CORES ( ASTM D2726 / AASHTO T166 – Core Thickness per ASTM D3549 )

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE SAMPLED
CLIENTREFERENCE
ROAD / SECTIONTESTED BY
LAYER / MIX TYPESAMPLE NO.
REPORT NO.CORING DATE
RECEIVED DATETEST DATE

EQUIPMENT INFORMATION

BALANCE IDBALANCE ACCURACY
WATER BATH IDWATER TEMPERATURE
SUSPENSION APPARATUSCALIBRATION STATUS
CORING MACHINE IDCALIPER / GAUGE ID

REFERENCE DATA

THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY, Gmm-
TARGET / JMF BULK DENSITY, Gmb(target)-
MINIMUM ALLOWED PERCENT COMPACTION ( % Gmm )%
MAXIMUM ALLOWED PERCENT COMPACTION ( % Gmm )%

CORE THICKNESS ( ASTM D3549 )

CORE No. THICKNESS 1
(mm)		 THICKNESS 2
(mm)		 THICKNESS 3
(مم)		 THICKNESS 4
(mm)		 AVG. THICKNESS
(mm)

TEST SAMPLES ( BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY, Gmb )

CORE No. DRY MASS
IN AIR (A), gm		 SSD MASS
IN AIR (B), gm		 MASS IN
WATER (C), gm		 Gmb DENSITY
(kg/m³)		 % Gmm
(COMPACTION)		 AIR VOIDS
Va, %		 STATUS
AVERAGE - - - - -

CALCULATIONS ( USING AVERAGE VALUES )

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY, Gmb =
A
B - C
PERCENT COMPACTION ( % OF Gmm ) =
Gmb
Gmm
x 100
IN-PLACE AIR VOIDS, Va =
Gmm - Gmb
Gmm
x 100
PERCENT OF TARGET (JMF) DENSITY =
Gmb
Gmb(target)
x 100
COMPACTION SPEC. STATUS ( vs. limits above ) = Pass if all cores within Min/Max % Gmm limits

TEST CONDITIONS

Standard:
Thickness Method:
Water Temperature:
Coring Method:
Sample Condition:
Suspension in Water Duration:

REMARKS

Tested By
Reviewed By
Approved By

ASPHALT QUANTITY & MATERIALS CALCULATION (Multi-layer: Base / Binder / Wearing — quantities derived from Mix Design)

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECTDATE
CLIENTREF. NO.
LOCATION / ROADPREPARED BY
WASTE / LOSS FACTOR %COMPACTED DENSITY BASISFrom Design tab (Gmb / Unit Weight @ OBC), editable per layer
TRUCK CAPACITY (per load) tonBITUMEN SPECIFIC GRAVITY (typ. 1.00–1.05, ton→liters)
Add one card per pavement layer (Base / Binder / Wearing). Pull the compacted density (Gmb) and design asphalt content (AC%) directly from the Mix Design tab, or enter them manually — both are fully editable. Pull the blend materials from the Mix Design tab and tag each one as Coarse / Fine / Filler to get the aggregate breakdown by type.

MATERIAL PROCUREMENT SUMMARY (ALL LAYERS)

Item Net Quantity (ton) + Waste Factor Quantity to Order (ton) Truckloads
(trips)		 Price / Ton
(optional)		 Est. Cost Actual Delivered
(ton)		 Actual vs Net
Variance %
Coarse Aggregate------
Fine Aggregate------
Filler------
RAP / Recycled------
Other / Unclassified------
TOTAL AGGREGATE----—---
Asphalt Binder (Bitumen)------
— Bitumen Volume (Liters)-
TOTAL COMPACTED ASPHALT MIX------
Total volume across all layers is shown on each layer card. Waste factor is applied uniformly using the value set above. Truckloads use the truck capacity set above (rounded up). Price/Ton and Actual Delivered are optional — fill them in to get estimated cost and real waste % vs the assumed waste factor.

NOTES

RATE OF SPREAD OF LIQUID BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (SPRAYING TEST) MC (Medium Curing) & RC (Rapid Curing) Spray Test

🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECT DATE SAMPLED
CLIENT REFERENCE
LOCATION TESTED BY
STATION SAMPLE NO.
DATE TESTED REPORT NO.
SPECIFICATION MATERIAL / GRADE

SPRAYING TEST — MC (MEDIUM CURING)

123
Sample No. 123
Dimension of platecm
Area of platecm2
Weight before testgm
Weight after testgm
Rate of spray (gm/cm2)gm/cm2
Rate of spray (Kg/m2)Kg/m2
Target Application RateKg/m2 Min Max
Average Rate of SprayKg/m2
Compliance Status (vs. Target Rate)

REMARKS

Tested By
Reviewed By
Approved By
🔒 This section is locked. Unlock it to edit or reset the results.
PROJECT DATE SAMPLED
CLIENT REFERENCE
LOCATION TESTED BY
STATION SAMPLE NO.
DATE TESTED REPORT NO.
SPECIFICATION MATERIAL / GRADE

SPRAYING TEST — RC (RAPID CURING)

123
Sample No. 123
Dimension of platecm
Area of platecm2
Weight before testgm
Weight after testgm
Rate of spray (gm/cm2)gm/cm2
Rate of spray (Kg/m2)Kg/m2
Target Application RateKg/m2 Min Max
Average Rate of SprayKg/m2
Compliance Status (vs. Target Rate)

REMARKS

Tested By
Reviewed By
Approved By

TEST REPORTTensile Strength Ratio — Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures

🚧
Coming soon
This module is under development and will be added in an upcoming update.
AASHTO T283 / Lottman Method

TEST REPORTAsphalt Binder Content by the Ignition Method

🚧
Coming soon
This module is under development and will be added in an upcoming update.
AASHTO T308 / ASTM D6307

TEST REPORTAsphalt Binder Properties — Penetration, Softening Point, Ductility & Viscosity

🚧
Coming soon
This module is under development and will be added in an upcoming update.
ASTM D5 / D36 / D113 / D2170

TEST REPORTEffect of Heat and Air on Asphalt Binder — Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test

🚧
Coming soon
This module is under development and will be added in an upcoming update.
ASTM D2872 / AASHTO T240